Filed under: Uncategorized
A look at Columbia University’s land-grab efforts in West Harlem. Produced by the Youth Leadership Group of the Mirabal Sisters Cultural and Community Center.
Filed under: Uncategorized
An recent op-ed by Columbia undergrad Yasmeen Ar-Rayani argues that the University acts as a colonial force in Harlem by taking advantage of a highly unequal education system:
But what can we make of the educational component of this particular project’s PR campaign, given the “separate and unequal” reality in which local schools operate? In effect, Columbia is taking advantage of educational apartheid in order to sugarcoat its expansion. If Harlem had quality schools despite its low property tax level, it wouldn’t need the services that Columbia provides and subsequently uses to justify the displacement of local residents. These educational initiatives do not work against educational apartheid; they work with it. It is a classic colonial strategy to strike with one hand and give with the other. Student volunteer work appropriated by the administration is a part of this overall operation, despite its alliance with the gentler hand.
This effort to cloak expansion with “charity” adds insult to injury. In 2007, University President Lee Bollinger spoke on the Manhattanville expansion at a local community board meeting. Though he was heckled throughout his speech, the roar of the crowd climaxed when Bollinger listed the “benefits” that the expansion would bring to Harlem. Despite the verbal attacks, there he stood, grinning relentlessly, a white man informing people of color that the takeover of their territory is in their best interest.
Filed under: Uncategorized
In response to an offensive, lying, PR sign over Columbia’s gate that says: “We’re neighbors helping neighbors” students held a lively demonstration, changing the sign to “We’re neighbors DISPLACING neighbors.”
Columbia’s own numbers estimate 5,000 Harlem residents will be displaced in the coming years – we believe many more than that will be priced out of their neighborhood.
At the demo, students dressed as mock university administrators pleaded, “But we’re helping!!!” to which the community responded, “LIES!!!!”
Filed under: Uncategorized
Artwork posted in the hallway of Barnard College at Columbia. Much credit to the unknown artist.
Check out this video documentary by students Nick Kraus and Dominique Mosbergen:
From the CU Senate minutes proposed January 29, 2010:
[President Bollinger] recalled that Community Board 9 ultimately voted in favor of the project, and Columbia worked out an extensive community benefits agreement, committing itself over the life of the development to an extraordinary array of helpful projects
How easily Bollinger forgets. Not only did CB9 actually vote down the project 32-2, they booed Bollinger for nearly two minutes straight! See the video clip below.
It’s worth noting that CB9 also unanimously voted down the community benefits agreement he says is so wonderful.
Filed under: Uncategorized
From the Spec:
State Senator Bill Perkins (D-West Harlem) likened the threat of eminent domain to “using a gun in a mugging. … You don’t always have to use the gun. People say, ‘Here, take my money.”
Holding up a sign that read “Harlem is not for sale, it’s our home,” Perkins said to laughter from the crowd, “There’s not much more to say.”
Many attendees compared the court victory—which came as a surprise to many—as a modern-day David and Goliath story, and credited it to strong community mobilization.
…
“The lesson here is about struggle, that if a community struggles against seemingly gigantic, David and Goliath odds, you will prevail,” said Nellie Bailey, Harlem Tenants Council president and a member of the Coalition to Preserve Community, adding, “Power concedes nothing without a demand.”
In response, CU officials said they aren’t actually listed as litigants in the case or appeal. Whether or not they put their name on it doesn’t change their actions in West Harlem or their continued desire to use eminent domain against the Harlem community despite that the court ruled such actions unconstitutional.
There’s also video coverage from NY1 here.
Filed under: In the Media | Tags: appeal, eminent domain, Patterson, Perkins
From the Spec:
Perkins urged Paterson not to appeal the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division’s ruling, writing Tuesday that eminent domain is “part of an insidious form of discrimination and civil rights violations that must not stand.”
Filed under: In the Media, Info, Update | Tags: Bollinger, constitution, eminent domain, spectator
University President Bollinger quoted in the Spec:
The Empire State Development Corporation will appeal the decision to New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, and Bollinger said in his Freedom of Speech and Press course on Monday that the outcome will “determine whether or not we have a new campus.”
After offering limited statements in the days following last Thursday’s court ruling, Bollinger responded to questions from students in his class, saying, “Eminent domain is crucial to the campus as conceived of and as approved by the city and the city rezoning process. The consequences of not having eminent domain for Columbia’s future in this area are really inextricably tied together, and we will not have the campus that was envisioned.”
This quote comes from his constitutional law class. And yes, his expansion was ruled unconstitutional!
However, the expansion is still moving forward with “preconstruction” to harass the remaining local businesses and the university still controls 90% of the land that they plan to move forward with:
Pre-construction is already underway because the ESDC approved eminent domain last December. But it is in the earliest stages, with utility work on gas, water, and electrical lines taking place on sections of Broadway, 129th Street, and 12th Avenue. Demolition is scheduled in the near future for certain buildings in the block bounded by Broadway, 12th Avenue, 129th Street, and 130th Street.
The $250 million Mind, Brain, and Behavior building, one of the first scheduled to go up—though not for several years—can proceed for now without eminent domain, Bollinger said.
Tell Bollinger to stop this unconstitutional expansion!!! HARLEM NOT FOR SALE!!



